CONNECTED ATLAS
AT-1585

Map Is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions

URL ยท Critical / corrective research

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1585
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1585
Types
URL
Roles
Critical / corrective research
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-1585

Supreme Creator Concepts

Why Connected Atlas uses this citation here

Jonathan Z. Smith's methodological critique of decontextualized comparison; a control against turning selected high gods, creators, first causes and cosmic principles into one universal religion.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Supreme Creator Concepts

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Creator claims must be tied to named texts, oral accounts, rituals, arguments, or ethnographies in particular historical and community settings.

Supreme Creator Concepts are a real and important comparative category. They help map how humans imagine origin, order, authority, morality, and the source of existence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Limited comparison can identify similarities among creator concepts, but it cannot show that every society recognizes one highest creator or inherited one universal religion.

Supreme Creator Concepts are a real and important comparative category. They help map how humans imagine origin, order, authority, morality, and the source of existence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Comparative scholarship can group high-god and creator figures while preserving major differences; this catalog directly anchors only Genesis and Qur'anic examples.

Answer / theory: Many cultures have high or creator figures, but not all have the same type of supreme creator. What supports it: Comparative mythology and ethnographic records. What is weak or disputed: Universal identity claims flatten differences. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Genesis 1 and Qur'an 6:101 attest distinct creator formulations; comparative synthesis does not make them universal, interchangeable, or evidence of one source.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Reading creator language as evidence of non-human technology is unsupported by the listed scriptural and comparative sources.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Supreme creator concepts do not by themselves establish one original universal religion or one non-human creator source.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Map Is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions

Open original

Search Connected Atlas

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Report an issue

This local preview does not transmit data. It prepares a report for copying.