CONNECTED ATLAS
AT-1520

Qur'an 35:1

URL · Primary evidence / text

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1520
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1520
Types
URL
Roles
Primary evidence / text
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-1520

Angels

Why Connected Atlas uses this citation here

Primary Qur'anic passage describing angels as messengers with wings; evidence within Qur'anic angelology that should not be retrojected into Hebrew Bible categories or conflated with jinn.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

The listed sources support several tradition-specific heavenly-being and angel categories rather than one universal angel taxonomy.

Angels are a real and important source category in ancient and later religious traditions, but the category is layered. The oldest material is not a single, neat taxonomy of winged humanoids. It is a network of messengers, divine council figures, throne beings, fiery beings, watchers, named heavenly agents, and later theological ranks.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’an 35:1 depicts angels as winged messengers, while Burge documents a broader Islamic angelology distinct from jinn and devils.

Angels are a real and important source category in ancient and later religious traditions, but the category is layered. The oldest material is not a single, neat taxonomy of winged humanoids. It is a network of messengers, divine council figures, throne beings, fiery beings, watchers, named heavenly agents, and later theological ranks.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Isaiah 6 and Qur’an 35:1 attest wings in two tradition-specific heavenly-being contexts; neither passage supplies a universal angel anatomy.

Answer / theory: No. Some heavenly beings are winged, but messenger angels are not always described that way. What supports it: Varied biblical categories and later art history. What is weak or disputed: Popular art often reads wings back into every passage. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’an 35:1 and Burge’s study support a tradition-specific Islamic angelology that does not collapse angels into jinn.

Answer / theory: Not in mainstream Islamic theology. Angels and jinn are distinct categories. What supports it: Qur'an, hadith, and Islamic theological tradition. What is weak or disputed: Some exegetical traditions debate Iblis's classification, but that does not erase the general distinction. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The cataloged religious and academic sources do not provide evidence that angel traditions record extraterrestrial contact.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Qur'an 35:1

Open original

Search Connected Atlas

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Report an issue

This local preview does not transmit data. It prepares a report for copying.